Rochester MN MTG
HomeHome  CalendarCalendar  FAQFAQ  SearchSearch  MemberlistMemberlist  UsergroupsUsergroups  RegisterRegister  Log in  
Similar topics
    Latest topics
    » Possible Gatecrash Spoilers (Also, this place is boring. What's going on down in Rochester to kill the forums?)
    Mon Nov 19, 2012 1:30 am by Ran

    » Return to Ravnica
    Fri Sep 14, 2012 1:52 am by Ran

    » trading post
    Mon Jul 16, 2012 11:40 pm by Ran

    » Bruna as Commander
    Tue Jun 19, 2012 11:21 am by Blacrowe

    » Sacrifice!
    Tue May 22, 2012 11:01 pm by MindofMyrddin

    » U/R Mad Cards (Avacyn Restored)
    Sun May 13, 2012 9:00 pm by MindofMyrddin

    » G/W Aggro GP Minneapolis
    Thu May 10, 2012 2:59 pm by MindofMyrddin

    » WTF is wizards doing to me.
    Fri May 04, 2012 5:08 pm by Ran

    » U/W Delver Spirit Mantle
    Wed Apr 18, 2012 3:48 pm by gunndaddyp

    December 2017

    Share | 

     G/W/U Infect

    View previous topic View next topic Go down 

    Posts : 285
    Join date : 2009-10-25
    Age : 32

    PostSubject: G/W/U Infect   Sun Nov 07, 2010 3:45 pm

    Here's what I'm gonna try next, and if it fails I may switch to a G/R infect list that Andrew showed me.

    Creatures: x16
    4x Necropede
    4x Ichorclaw Myr
    4x Blight Mamba
    4x Stoneforge Mystic

    Instants: x12
    4x Vines of Vastwood
    4x Emerge Unscathed
    4x Prey's Vengeance

    Sorceries: x7
    4x Distortion Strike
    3x Oust

    Artifacts: x5
    4x Livewire Lash
    1x Grafted Exoskeleton

    Lands: x20
    4x Misty Rainforest
    3x Seachrome Coast
    1x Razorverge Thicket
    1x Island
    6x Forest
    5x Plains

    Sideboard: x15
    3x Condemn
    3x Kor Firewalker
    3x Nature's Claim
    4x Spreading Seas
    2x Disperse

    It's a combo thing that tries to abuse Livewire Lash. Just added the blue splash (rhyme scheme?). If it makes the deck super inconsistent then I'll probably switch to G/R infect. Dan was trying to tell me that Livewire Lash is OP/broken. I definitely wouldn't go that far, but it's way good with infect creatures. I talked trash about the new duals when I first read them, but if they work anywhere it's going to be in a deck with low land and CMC count. Note the deck tops out at 2 CMC (not counting Grafted Exoskeleton because you bring it into play with Stoneforge)

    Last edited by Inez on Sun Nov 07, 2010 6:44 pm; edited 1 time in total
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile


    Posts : 172
    Join date : 2009-10-26

    PostSubject: Re: G/W/U Infect   Sun Nov 07, 2010 6:33 pm

    seems like a deck that can run low mana count like rogues used to would be good. Tri-color just sounds like it's stretching without any mana fetch, but with high dual count it could work.
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile

    Posts : 285
    Join date : 2009-10-25
    Age : 32

    PostSubject: Re: G/W/U Infect   Sun Nov 07, 2010 6:44 pm

    Yeah it could be a disaster running tri-color with 20 land count, but a significant amount of the win cons are colorless (Ichorclaw, Necropede, Lash), so I'm gonna give it a whirl.
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile


    Posts : 275
    Join date : 2010-01-09
    Location : Rochester

    PostSubject: Re: G/W/U Infect   Mon Nov 08, 2010 10:50 am

    a neat variant is trinket mage to fetch vector asp; don't know how efficient in tri
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile


    Posts : 167
    Join date : 2009-11-02
    Age : 26
    Location : Minneapolis

    PostSubject: Re: G/W/U Infect   Thu Nov 11, 2010 4:57 pm

    I was thinking of a similar deck. The lash seems REALLY good with infect. But I couldn't decide which colors were best. I had thought of your colors, but was so hung up on the fact that red had assault strobe, plus good burn. But realized that the burn was just taking away from the poison aspect. I mean, yeah, you could bolt your own dude for the last two or something, but I don't know. I also figured red would be awesome for kiln fiend, or even precursor golem. Once again, although fiend has synergy with the instant and sorcery spells, he's more "kill your opponent" than deal "10 poison damage." I was going to justify it by saying that they'd have to make a choice then. Take a lot of poison, or focus on my fiend, but that didn't happen. Probably why I neglected white as an option was because I only have 1 stoneforge mystic. But anyway, I like your list, and I'd be interested in hearing how the testing goes.
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile

    Posts : 285
    Join date : 2009-10-25
    Age : 32

    PostSubject: Re: G/W/U Infect   Fri Nov 12, 2010 3:19 am

    I actually built the R/G one you sent me the link to Andrew. I built it online too for $10. It plays all right. You can get fairly consistent turn three wins, but as with any other combo deck its disruptable. Dare I say, creatures die to removal? Oops I gave away the secret to beating the deck. You have to run removal.
    Back to top Go down
    View user profile
    Sponsored content

    PostSubject: Re: G/W/U Infect   

    Back to top Go down
    G/W/U Infect
    View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
    Page 1 of 1
     Similar topics
    » what if danians could infect players

    Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
    RMTG :: Standard-
    Jump to: